Amherst College Acceptance Rate, SAT/ACT Scores

Amherst College is a private liberal arts college with an acceptance rate of 13%. Located in a small town in Western Massachusetts, Amherst stands at #1 or #2 in national rankings of  top liberal arts colleges and is one of the  most selective colleges  in the United States. Amherst has an open curriculum with no distribution requirements. For its strength in the liberal arts and sciences, the college earned membership in Phi Beta Kappa. Academics at Amherst are supported by a healthy 8-to-1 student/faculty ratio. Students can round out the Amherst course offerings with classes from the other schools in the  five-college consortium:  Mount Holyoke College,  Smith College,  Hampshire College, and the  University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Considering applying to this highly selective college? Here are the Amherst admissions statistics you should know. Acceptance Rate During the 2017-18 admissions cycle, Amherst had an acceptance rate of 13%. This means that for every 100 students who applied, 13 students were admitted, making Amhersts admissions process highly competitive. Admissions Statistics (2017-18) Number of Applicants 9,723 Percent Admitted 13% Percent Admitted Who Enrolled (Yield) 39% SAT Scores and Requirements Amherst College requires that all applicants submit either SAT or ACT scores. During the 2017-18 admissions cycle, 47% of admitted students submitted SAT scores. SAT Range (Admitted Students) Section 25th Percentile 75th Percentile ERW 660 750 Math 670 780 ERW=Evidence-Based Reading and Writing This admissions data tells us that most of Amhersts admitted students fall within the top 20% nationally on the SAT. For the evidence-based reading and writing section, 50% of students admitted to Amherst scored between 660 and 750, while 25% scored below 660 and 25% scored above 750. On the math section, 50% of admitted students scored between 670 and 780, while 25% score below 670 and 25% scored above 780. Applicants with a composite SAT score of 1530 or higher will have particularly competitive chances at Amherst. Requirements Amherst does not require, but strongly recommends, the SAT writing section. Note that Amherst participates in the scorechoice program, which means that the admissions office will consider your highest score from each individual section across all SAT test dates. ACT Scores and Requirements Amherst requires that all applicants submit either SAT or ACT scores. During the 2017-18 admissions cycle, 54% of admitted students submitted ACT scores. ACT Range (Admitted Students) Section 25th Percentile 75th Percentile English 32 35 Math 28 34 Composite 31 34 This admissions data tells us that most of Amhersts admitted students fall within the top 5% nationally on the ACT. The middle 50% of students admitted to Amherst received a composite ACT score between 31 and 34, while 25% scored above 34 and 25% scored below 31. Requirements While not required, Amherst strongly recommends the ACT writing section. Unlike many colleges, Amherst superscores ACT results; your highest subscores from multiple ACT sittings will be considered. GPA Amherst College does not provide data about admitted students high school GPAs. Self-Reported GPA/SAT/ACT Graph Amherst College Applicants Self-Reported GPA/SAT/ACT Graph. Data courtesy of Cappex. The admissions data in the graph is self-reported by applicants to Amherst College. GPAs are unweighted. Find out how you compare to accepted students, see the real-time graph, and calculate your chances of getting in with a free Cappex account. Admissions Chances Amherst College has a highly competitive admissions pool with a low acceptance rate and high average SAT/ACT scores. However, Amherst has a holistic admissions process involving other factors beyond your grades and test scores. A  strong application essay, Amherst writing supplement, and  glowing letters of recommendation can strengthen your application, as can participation in meaningful extracurricular activities and a rigorous course schedule. Applicants with special accomplishments in art, research, or athletics may submit optional additional information to Amherst. Students with particularly compelling stories or achievements can still receive serious consideration even if their test scores are outside Amhersts average range. In the scattergram above, the blue and green dots represent accepted students, and you can see that most students who got into Amherst had averages of A- or higher, SAT scores (ERWM) above 1300, and ACT composite scores above 27. Your chances will be significantly higher with test scores above these lower ranges. Also notice that there is quite a bit of red (rejected students) among the green and blue. High test scores and grades are no guarantee of admission to this top-ranked liberal arts college. All admissions data has been sourced from the National Center for Education Statistics and Amherst College Undergraduate Admissions Office.

The Effects of Climate Change on Right Whales - 1389 Words

The effect climate change has on the environment is astounding, especially the effects targeted at right whales living within the ocean. The preservation of right whales is threatened due to the rise in temperatures, salinity changes, and sea level rise. By researching the effects of climate change on these whales, three things can be identified: the decrease in food sources for whales as a result of climate change, the effect of climate change on whale migration patterns and reproduction, and the effects of temperature and salinity variation on their communication. Understanding the effects climate change has on right whales is extremely important because they are influential to scientific research and understanding the stability of the ocean. Without the presence of whales, the oceanic food chain will be destabilized, leading to various problems that affect the economy, science, and the ocean’s productivity. If life within the ocean becomes destabilized, certain species will die off, others will overpopulate, and ultimately, humans will suffer the consequences. Right whales feed off of one general food source – calanus finmarchicus or plankton (www.rightwhales.neaq.org). However, due to the temperature rises and higher carbon concentrations in the ocean as a result of climate change, plankton populations have been affected. Through conductive testes, it was discovered that increased levels of CO2 in the ocean have lowered hatch rates and embryonic development ofShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of Seaworld And San Diego1215 Words   |  5 Pagesout its killer whale shows. This decision is what PETA and other oppositions of SeaWorld has been seeking, but there is no news of ending these shows at their Orlando and San Antonio locations. There is Federal legislation in the works to ban orca breeding, importing and exporting them for public display. This legislation is called the Orca Act and is still in its early stages of proposal. Passing of th e Orca Act would most likely be the only way Orlando would stop its killer whale shows. StakeholdersRead MoreGlobal Warming and Climate Change: Melting the Marine Life Essay668 Words   |  3 PagesPacific region since they are being less adaptable, yet that area is fished more. â€Å"Climate change: The effects on ocean animals† (400 words) Many other animals besides the coral trout are being affected my global warming. The â€Å"poster child† for it is the polar bear, and some others are sea turtles, right whales, penguins, and seals. The polar bear lives up in the Arctic region where global warming and climate change are melting the ice caps that the bears thrive on. They use the ice as a platformRead MoreThe Effects Of Climate Change On Our Planet1172 Words   |  5 PagesClimate is the weather conditions over a long term. For millions of years, the earth kept changing between hot and cold, and wet and dry. As the earth warmed and cooled, plants and animals appeared and disappeared. People have had to change their way of life many times as plant and animal life changed. Since the industrial revolution, the humans built many factories and invented lots of electronic devices. They emit harmful gases called greenhouse gases like carbon dioxides and ozone, which affectsRead MoreThe Alarming and Troublesome Global Warming Issue 1407 Words   |  6 Pages Global warming has been one of the most challenging problems our society has encountered and people dont acknowledge that our climate change is becoming worse a s the time goes by. Climate change which is said to be the regular or ordinary weather in an environment consists of patterns like seasons and temperature. Climate patterns play such an important role in constructing an essential ecosystem, human economies and cultures that rely on them has raised the surface of the worlds oceans in recentRead MoreNoise Pollution Case Study Solution866 Words   |  4 Pages Noise Pollution Your Particular Case Study: http://e360.yale.edu/features/how_ocean_noise_pollution_wreaks_havoc_on_marine_life Table of Contents: Click here to jump to the right spot.î ¿ ¿ Research Notes Background on your topic: Your topic: Provide Solutions: Resources: Storyboard Rubricî ¿ ¾ Starting Point for Research Research Notes Background on your topic: Why is the ocean so important? (Food webs, oxygen producer, CO2 sink etc.) The ocean is important because it is a home to many different animalsRead MoreThe Sea Of The Mediterranean Sea1632 Words   |  7 Pagesto have hot, dry summers and wet winters except for the Southern regions considering they have desert-like climates. Early civilizations thought that the Mediterranean was the center of their region considering they had not traveled out of their boundaries yet, therefore giving its Latin name â€Å"mediterraneus†, meaning â€Å"middle of land.† Its combination of strong winds and an arid climate results in intense evaporation, causing a deficit of water in which nearly three million tons of water is evaporatedRead MoreNegative Impact of Whaling in Japan1125 Words   |  4 Pages Biodiversity often appears as an under the radar issue that is put on the backburner to other environmental problems such as: climate change, ocean acidification, or ozone depletion. When in reality, it should really be a frontrunner as it explicitly involves all living things that dwell within our shared biosphere. While the human population did not really start making waves to remedy the endangerment or extinction of plants and animals until the 1970s with laws that included, the Marine MammalRead MoreWhales and Interference654 Words   |  3 PagesEight out of 10 right whales bear the scars left behind by accidental encounters with fishing rope. These thick lines can wrap so tightly around the whales that they die from lacerations. (Ragen et. Al., 2005) Noise from numerous anthropogenic sources is both extensively and increasingly present within the marine surrounding. Human activities are leaving both deep and profound acoustic footmarks in the oceans of the world, and this is because of technological innovation and climate change. New and currentRead MoreAnimal Safety : Endangered Species1645 Words   |  7 Pageshorns in order for them to sell them in markets. So today tracking the rhino movements is necessary in order to help the program set up hotlines to help stop the poachers from approaching the rhinos. Many polar bears today are dying because of the climate change. Ice is beginning to melt and this equals a loss of sea ice for these animals to live in. WWF aims to preserve the rich biodiversity of polar bears in order to save them. The marine turtles are perhaps the most well know endangered species. ThisRead MoreOn April 29Th, Marking The First 100 Days Of The Trump803 Words   |  4 PagesOn April 29th, marking the first 100 days of the Trump administration, throngs will assemble in Washington, D.C. for the People s Climate Mobilization, a march to support action against climate change. Organizers say the number of participants could rival that of a similar 2014 event in New York City which drew 400,000 people. Activists in Massachusetts have already chartered dozens of buses to take demonstrators to D.C. I decided to join the march without a moment’s hesitation. Despite the prospect

Philosophy Paper Free Essays

In this paper, I will discuss euthanasia and demonstrate its immoral implications using J. Gay-Williams’ essay, â€Å"The Wrongfulness of Euthanasia†; more specifically his attempt to show the wrongfulness of euthanasia through an argument from nature. I believe that the argument is valid and presents a very good approach for those who are opposed to euthanasia. We will write a custom essay sample on Philosophy Paper or any similar topic only for you Order Now Below is my effort to summarize this view by placing it in the standard argument format. Argument from Nature ) If there is a person in a situation, where a natural instinct compels them to take action, it is morally wrong to intentionally suppress that instinct. 2) In all euthanasia cases, there is a doctor is in a situation where their patient’s natural instinct compels them to survive. 3) Therefore, in all euthanasia cases, it is morally wrong for a doctor to intentionally suppress their patient’s natural instinct to survive. The argument above is derived from part one of Gay-Williams essay. He begins his discussion of the argument from nature by asserting that each person â€Å"has a natural inclination to continue living†. He displays this furthermore by explaining, that everything about the composition of a human organism has been designed to have a conditioned reaction that makes â€Å"the continuation of life a natural goal. † It is by this rationale he claims, â€Å"that euthanasia sets us against our own nature. † In order to further demonstrate the argument’s validity and good quality, I will explain how it follows all the rules of a good argument. The rules are as follows: 1) all the premises are reasonable 2) the conclusion follows 3) the argument does not beg the question. Premise one may be better explained in and of itself through an example having to do with a general, natural instinct. One example could be when someone is in a situation in which their family is put in harms way when an intruder with sinister motives enters their house. It is a natural reaction to protect that which belongs to you (in this situation your property-your â€Å"territory† and your blood- your family). To stand idly by and witness attacks upon your family and home, without in any way, making an effort to stop the attacks, would require an ntentional suppression of a natural instinct. Premise two becomes more specific by stating that in euthanasia cases throughout, a doctor is always in a situation in which their patient’s natural instincts compel them (for as we saw in the quotes from J. Gay-Williams, a human’s conditioned response in all situations-based on the make-up of the body-is to function in a way that would always enable (or lean towards) co ntinuity. ) to survive. The way to show that this argument follows rule number two is to reveal its logical pattern. ) If there is P (a person in a situation), where Q (a natural instinct compels them to take an action), it is R (morally wrong to intentionally suppress that instinct). 2) In all S (euthanasia cases), there is P (a doctor in a situation), where Q (their patient’s natural instinct compels them to survive). 3) Therefore, in all S (euthanasia cases), it is R (morally wrong for a doctor to intentionally suppress their patient’s natural instinct to survive). I think that this argument is good. The way in which Gay-Williams went about presenting his case was commendable. He did make brief reference to there being a God, and that human beings are supposed to act as â€Å"trustee of his body†, and in taking a life or our own, humans are acting against him. However, it seemed as though he was keeping in mind that many people might not share the same beliefs as he, and therefore needed to have rational arguments against euthanasia which pertained in no way to faith or religion. This was the admirable thing, because it seems that many times religious people, although trying to argue an important idea, seem to have no rational approach and end up â€Å"Bible-thumping†, and coming across as ignorant. One objection someone might have to this argument would be to premise two. Someone might say that the premise is generalizing when it says â€Å"all euthanasia cases†, because in certain cases of euthanasia a person might not be being kept alive through natural means any longer (such as: artificial life support); therefore, it can’t be said that the person’s natural instinct is to survive because without life support the person would have already died thus following the natural instinct towards death. My response to this objection would be the following: in my interpretation of J. Gay-Williams argument from nature, I used â€Å"In all euthanasia cases, there is a doctor is in a situation where their patient’s natural instinct compels them to survive. † As my second premise. And I must admit, that with this as the second premise, the argument is flawed as the objector revealed. However, if I were to make the second premise not end with â€Å"natural instinct compels them to survive† and rather put â€Å"natural instinct compels them† then it wouldn’t be a flawed argument. This is because it would merely be adding a twist on the argument, which Gay-Williams did not come right out and say, but it is implied. This twist that is implied is that it is morally wrong to go against any natural human instinct, and this includes the natural instinct of dying. Maybe then, the problem of removing someone or not removing someone from life support would no longer be the problem, due to the fact that artificial life support is preventing some people from allowing their bodies to follow the natural instinct to die. Now of course this seems a bit morbid, and I’m not at all suggesting that modern technology and what it can do to save lives is morally wrong, I’m simply showing what other routes this argument from nature implies. How to cite Philosophy Paper, Papers Philosophy Paper Free Essays While I have not personally experienced being in a position to choose between life and death, I have always been curious as to how such a decision could be made with complete consideration of ethical principles. I am particularly interested in the fact that the law recognizes the right of a patient to refuse medical treatment. This right includes the refusal of life-saving treatment, which could lead to death. We will write a custom essay sample on Philosophy Paper or any similar topic only for you Order Now The expression of a patient’s refusal could be made either before the administration of the treatment or at a prior and advanced time, well ahead of future incompetence (Michalowski). The recognition by the law of the patient’s right is so strong and resolute, such that the disregard of the patient’s wishes through the administration of medical treatment despite his refusal would amount to battery (Michalowski). However, despite the legal principles allowing, in certain circumstances, the decision to curtail a life or to halt the provision of life support systems, the question in my mind remains. Does a decision to continue or discontinue a life violative of an ethical principle? If so, I wonder up to what extent a decision to curtail or prolong one’s life would the action still be considered ethical. A patient is a person who has the right to decide everything that has to do with his own life. A popular position on this quandary is that together with this person’s right comes the responsibility to act responsibly. Before a patient’s refusal of medical treatment, it must be ensured that he is competent to make such an important decision. It must be ensured that he is apprised of all the facts necessary for him to make an intelligent decision. Thus, the patient must be told about the â€Å"nature and purpose of the procedure. † When making the decision, the patient must not be influenced by external factors. Finally, it must be made clear that the decision would apply to future circumstances (Michalowski, 2005). However, learning and understanding utilitarianism, an ethical theory developed by popular philosophers Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, I could not help but apply the theory in the situation described above. According to these philosophers, moral value of human actions should depend on the effect of such action on people (West). Thus, they did not believe that other factors, such as motive or will, have anything to do with morality (West). Indeed, utilitarianism has captured the interest of many people because it is often used to justify the morality of certain human actions, based on practical considerations. Following Bentham’s philosophy, the quandary could be resolved by taking into account the things that possibly motivate a man in his actions. Bentham and Mill worked on the assumption that only two possible things could motivate man (Online Guide to Ethics and Moral Philosophy). These are pleasure and pain. Man naturally desires happiness, but wants to avoid pain (West). The two utilitarian philosophers likewise believed that man only has one end, and such end is happiness, which is brought about by pleasure (Bentham; West). Thus, they formulated a thesis that holds that human action would be considered morally right or wrong, depending on whether it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people to promote happiness for the greatest number of people (Bentham). If so, such act would be morally right. Following Bentham’s rationalizations of his notion of utilitarianism, the dilemma could be analyzed following four points. First, it should be recognized that pain and pleasure play a fundamental role in human life (Online Guide to Ethics and Moral Philosophy). Thus, in the given scenario, both pain and pleasure would play out in varying degrees among the people involved, such as the patient, his friends and his family. Thereafter, it should be considered how human action gets the approval or disapproval of society. According to Bentham, such judgment by society is based on the action’s consequences (Online Guide to Ethics and Moral Philosophy). Thus, in application, the act of prolonging life support could affect society’s approval or non-approval depending on the consequences evoked by such an act, such as prolonged life or otherwise. The next consideration would involve the fact that pleasure is equated with good while pain is equated with evil (Online Guide to Ethics and Moral Philosophy). Finally, for utilitarian philosophers like Bentham, pleasure and pain could be measured through â€Å"quantification (Online Guide to Ethics and Moral Philosophy). † Thus, in the given scenario, I could rule on the morality of an act depending on certain criteria of evaluating pain or pleasure, such as the effected the consequences of the act of removing life support vis-a-vis the act of letting it continue. Thus, while other philosophies might accept the act of curtailing a person’s life based solely on the principle of patient autonomy, utilitarianism would not readily acquiesce in such a decision. Considerations based on the pain or pleasure it would impose on various interested stakeholders would have to be made. Only the solution that could offer the greatest happiness to the greatest number of people would be recognized by utilitarianism as the ethical course of action. Works Cited Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: Wilson Pickering, 1823. Michalowski, S. â€Å"Advance Refusals of Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment: The Relativity of an Absolute Right†. The Modern Law Review Limited 68. 6 (2005): 958-982. Online Guide to Ethics and Moral Philosophy. â€Å"Utilitarianism. † 2002. 19 Nov. 2008. http://caae. phil. cmu. edu/Cavalier/80130/part2/sect9. html. West, H. R. â€Å"Utilitarianism. † Encyclop? dia Britannica. 20 Nov. 2008. http://www. utilitarianism. com/utilitarianism. html. How to cite Philosophy Paper, Papers